Remembrance and Reflection: Commemorating the Shoah – Berlin and Budapest
My visits to Berlin and Budapest offered me the opportunity to see how these cities deal with commemorating a troubled and violent recent past. Such commemoration involves not only memorialisation but also acceptance of accountability with the promise of redemption. In addition, there is a need to indicate a sense of scale alongside the personalisation of a tragedy. How do we give shape to absence to generate an emotional yet thoughtful response and frame it as a warning from history? Various architects and artists have contributed works that try to encompass all of these elements, creating commemorative, artistic responses to absence that are participatory and inclusive, enabling remembrance and reflection at collective and individual levels. Naturally, context affects meaning. Emotional resonance is achieved partly through expectation and associations of place and time. However, some form of manifestation is required to commemorate absence, even to counter it. In some cases, artists have chosen to create the presence of a void in a space connected with deliberate eradication. Unconventional forms of commemoration are used to engage the viewer and encourage reflection. Focus is given to both lines and spaces, underscoring the violence that penetrated and destroyed lives and the resulting absence.
above and below: Exterior of Daniel Libeskind's 'Between the Lines' design for Berlin's Jewish Museum.
Daniel Libeskind’s ‘Between the Lines’ design for the Jewish
Museum in Berlin makes use of constricted spaces and jagged lines to create
feelings of disquiet and anxiety. The shapes used evoke the triangular lines of
the Star of David, which were distorted into the Nazi iconography of
persecution through the enforced wearing of yellow badges. It is explained in
the museum that Libeskind deliberately left empty spaces or voids in the
building to ‘represent the absence of Jews from German society’. When I
visited, I walked from the so-called ‘Axis of the Holocaust’, containing many personal
objects connected with victims, into the ‘Holocaust Tower’, a void exposed to
the outside air temperature and light from a slit above on one side. This means
the environment is subject to the time of day and season. Concrete walls
surround the visitor on all sides in a sort of triangular prism with a ladder
on one elevation, the bottom rung of which is unreachable. The acoustics make
for a lot of echo, and when someone enters or leaves, there is a resounding
bang of the door. The experience is something of an assault on the senses as the
architecture engenders feelings of entrapment, helplessness, and futility. The
slit of natural light counteracts these, possibly symbolising a faint glimmer
of hope.
In what is known as the ‘Memory Void’ in the Jewish Museum is
Menashe Kadishman’s Fallen Leaves, an art installation comprising 10,000
open-mouthed iron faces representing absence through presence, forcing
realisation of the sheer scale of the Holocaust. A visitor can walk on the
faces, generating an uncomfortable sensation heightened by the noise produced by
stepping on the layers of iron. Dedicated to ‘all innocent victims of war and
violence’, the work highlights the tragically pervasive nature of bloodshed in
human history, which continues today.
The impersonal character of many of these monuments emphasises
and warns against the detachment accompanying acts of violence. A counter to
this is Budapest’s ‘Shoes on the Danube’ memorial, created in 2005 to
commemorate the murder of 20,000 Hungarian Jews between December 1944 and
January 1945. The victims were required to remove their (valuable) shoes before
they were shot and their bodies cast into the river. Now, sixty pairs of iron
shoes—small, personal objects—placed along the Danube Promenade poignantly evoke
their memory. The viewer is urged to reflect on the fact that such items were
once considered by some more valuable than those who wore them.
The names of the missing are returned to them via the ‘Tree of Life’ memorial, erected in 1991 in a garden next to Budapest’s Great Synagogue and paid for by the late Tony Curtis (who had Hungarian-Jewish ancestry). The leaves of this metal tree are engraved with the names of Holocaust victims, with some left blank so that as new names come to light, they may be added. This monument, at once robust and delicate, manages to convey the magnitude of the tragedy it commemorates whilst also personalising it, distinguishing individual victims and returning their identities to them in the place where they were lost.
above and below: 'Tree of Life' memorial, Budapest.
When it comes to warnings from history, it is worth bearing
in mind the insidious, incremental steps on the road to catastrophe. Attacks on
culture often presage something far worse and are therefore worthy of
remembrance in themselves. Israeli artist Micha Ullman created the Bibliothek
memorial in 1995 to commemorate the burning of around 20,000 books on 10
May 1933 on the same site in Bebelplatz, Berlin. These were works deemed, for
various reasons, incompatible with Nazi ideology, so they were destroyed en
masse. Known as The Empty Library in English, the memorial is exactly
that: a series of bare bookshelves underground. An accompanying plaque shows a
quote by nineteenth-century writer Heinrich Heine, which reminds the viewer
that the burning of books is a prelude to burning human beings. Its position
beneath the plaza makes the memorial awkward to look at, giving rise to physical
discomfort appropriate to the subject. This is a memorial inverted, symbolising
a world turned upside down, its nature as a void once again commemorating absence
and, in this case, the obliteration of ideas acting as a precursor to the extermination
of millions of people. Perhaps it is an inversion that, separated from the
viewer by glass, is intended to suggest a glimpse into the other side of the
mirror, so to speak, inciting a look into the emptiness alongside seeing
oneself as both a potential destructive force and, conversely, a vessel of
knowledge and of hope. Which path will you choose? How disturbing is it to
think such opposing potentialities can co-exist in all of us?
These monuments fulfil several functions simultaneously,
commemorating lives lost but also creating a sense of disturbance, especially
in countries where a sense of guilt remains and redemption is needed. Lastly, they
provide a focus for reflection on the past to try to prevent repetition of
atrocities. Without wishing to end on a somewhat negative note, looking at the
world today and mindful of human nature, I must say that despite the best
efforts of artists, achievement of this final objective sadly seems something
of a vain hope.
For more information: Jewish Museum Berlin
Comments
Post a Comment